A brave man is he who admits his wrongs and the forgiver doesnt seem weak by cancelling a wrong doers debt. But this apology needs further redress. Two points needed for this is (1) desparation on the wrong doer (2) desparation on the forgiver.
(1)Desparation on the wrong doer.
The japanease, the indians and several western countries have labled Africans as inferiors. When Africans heard so, they said that was racism. Those speakers apologized for saying so and africans celebrated. It has been the same circus all along. Now if those western leaders can have courage to utter those remarks against Africans in public, imagine what they say in private. They talk more even. Our own brother prejudiced southerners publicly since over a year now, the people cried but the brother never bothered to even say sorry. Unconfortability turns soar for the brother as those he rode the horses for nolonger wants his services. Abandoned, cold, lonly, lost and disappointed because that band wagon cannot accomodate him no more, he turns to a wagon dominated by the southerns. He goes step by step through humiliation to seek for apology and the peaceful people accepts it without conditions. Now suppose the brother was still riding his fomer horses, would he have apologized? Or it needed the man to be sent into exile to realize how wrong he was all along? Or maybe he needs survival of the game by having no option but to join the people he prejudiced. The first two questions holds no water because they seem not to be genuine reasons. The last one stands out. The apology is like a kiss of judah, another way to continue getting 30 pieces of silver. If it took all along to realise his wrongs after making that statement, what more does he say when a journalist is not within his radius. Like those white supremests, they even congratulate themselves behind doors for humiliating Africans. But all in all, a politician will defend his move the same they defended that move. They are always right depending on which side they are seeing things from.
(2) Desparation on the forgiver. The American CIA can be sent even for 20 years to track down a terrorist. An agent may disguise themselves for all these years among the terrorist group until an opportunity strikes. Whatever happens in those years does not concern them. Their ultimate goal is to become victors by halting terrorism. Now in this case, the forgivers seem to be more concerned with what the terrorist will bring at last somewhere in 2021. Question is, if the man was still in his previous charriot, will they have started praising his move provided he apologized? Or they would have forgiven his words but still consider him bad anyway?. Forgiving is necessary but is it really a key opener to see how one is made of provided he joins you? Has anything changed of the man? Or he has brought with him an entry point. The last question is the main reason for the jubiliation. Whatever happens in war is none of the presidents business. when soldiers die or get wounded to purse victory: it is that victory that matters the most. The doer may have caused pain among the people, but that seems not to matter now because he will help make the opposite waggon win the next race. Thats all is needed. Forgiveness is vital, but it seems to be conditional. The man has changed from bad to darling in a blink of an eye. There maybe instant change but still the forgivers are concerned with victory. Nowander the game seems to be about if you are not with us, then you are against us. If all those in the rulling class were to jump on the opposite, they may be darlings period! Then who are really qualified to rule. Because its the same people getting recycled except for top a top most leader.
If this is the case then why waste resources recycling same people. Just maintain the positions and maybe we can be voting only one top most leader every half decade to rule as president.
No comments:
Post a Comment