And so i provoked a certain individual with a certain topic and got amazed he could justly articulate the topic.
One absurd moment got me to cut the discussion abruptly.
Reason was that i used a wrong example. But it will never be an exercise anyway. Like a mathematical exercise involving an additional problem in monetary terms, if the teacher uses an additional example involving animals, how wrong will his example be because he did not use monetary terms but animals? For example jesus would use a seed to describe heaven, heaven and seed are different but his example was not wrong, it helped to embed his teachings. An example doesnt need to sound exactly as the exercise as long as the rules used are similar.
One woman on a date was singing a song for her man like ''...when birds sing I...''
The man quickly ordered her woman to shut up, reason was that birds dont sing.
In another instance, two men discussing about how they gonna manage two deals in one time, one friend says, this is how we gonna kill two birds with one stone. The friend bursted in laughter telling his friend that he was crazy, how could two deals eventually turn into birds?
Its difficult to continue conversating with such people who always needs a math involving animals to always involve animals in example. If suppose an exercise is all about addition of humans, an example involving animals is definately wrong.
One absurd moment got me to cut the discussion abruptly.
Reason was that i used a wrong example. But it will never be an exercise anyway. Like a mathematical exercise involving an additional problem in monetary terms, if the teacher uses an additional example involving animals, how wrong will his example be because he did not use monetary terms but animals? For example jesus would use a seed to describe heaven, heaven and seed are different but his example was not wrong, it helped to embed his teachings. An example doesnt need to sound exactly as the exercise as long as the rules used are similar.
One woman on a date was singing a song for her man like ''...when birds sing I...''
The man quickly ordered her woman to shut up, reason was that birds dont sing.
In another instance, two men discussing about how they gonna manage two deals in one time, one friend says, this is how we gonna kill two birds with one stone. The friend bursted in laughter telling his friend that he was crazy, how could two deals eventually turn into birds?
Its difficult to continue conversating with such people who always needs a math involving animals to always involve animals in example. If suppose an exercise is all about addition of humans, an example involving animals is definately wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment